[Build Backlinks Online] The Holy Grail Of Building Communities: Developing A Strong Sense of Community

Build Backlinks Online has posted a new item, 'The Holy Grail Of Building
Communities: Developing A Strong Sense of Community'

Posted by RichardMillington
None of the technology released in the past five years has made us better at
building communities.
It's made it
easier to build communities, but it hasn't made us better at building
communities.
In fact, much of it has proved a costly distraction that has reduced the
chances of us succeeding.
We say that with confidence. We've crunched, munched, and otherwise stared at
numbers until our eyes bleed. Technology tweaks, barring a correction for an
earlier mistake, rarely have a big long-term impact upon a community's level of
growth and activity.
We've had organizations invest millions (the record was $2.1m) on a new
community platform to revive a fading community. That's a lot of money to waste.
That's at the '
people getting fired' level of money.
There is a far better approach to making our communities more successful. It
doesn't involve big technology overhauls or spammy marketing pushes.
It's
creating a sense of community.
In this post, I'm going to outline why the sense of community is the missing
piece of the community puzzle, the power of a strong sense of community, and how
we can use social science to guide us.
The closest thing we have to a silver bullet

Sense of community is the idea that community is
experienced (or imagined).
The only people in a community are those that believe they are, not those that
have completed a registration form
in 30 seconds.

When people are really members of acommunity, they feel a strong psychological
connection to that group.
They sacrifice part of their own identity to accept, embrace, and then defend
the group identity.
Sense of community has been shown to significantly
increase activity, increasecustomer loyalty and buying behaviour, higherlevels
of brand advocacy,increase knowledge exchange, andreduced tendency to engage in
negative behaviors.
The research here is about as conclusive as the existence of gravity. This can
lead to only one conclusion, that we absolutely must be developing a sense of
community among our members.
It's not a silver bullet for community professionals, but it's the closest
thing we will ever get to a silver bullet.
The problem at the moment is most community professionals completely ignore
this. They don't try to create a strong sense of community among their members.
Those that do don't understand the principles of doing so. They hop from one
idea to the next hoping each new idea will give them the sense of community
explosion they crave.
Let's change this. If we want to immediately be much better at building
communities, let's master the core principles of fostering a sense of community.
The four foundations for sense of community were highlighted in a
landmark article published David McMillan and David Chavis in 1986. These are:
1)Membership
2)Influence
3)Integration andfulfilmentof needs
4)Shared emotional connections

Membership is the feeling that an individual has a right to belong in the
community and can identify other members who also have the right to belong in a
community. It comprises four attributes:
1) Boundaries
2) Emotional safety
3) Personal investment
4) A common symbol system.
You can intentionally add (or manipulate) each attribute to your
community.1)Boundaries

Boundaries separate insiders from outsiders. Boundaries are what separate your
community from mainstream society. They allow members to be themselves and
emotionally open to the group.
Boundaries can be real (think gated communities) or imagined (common
experience). They can include rituals and traditions.
The higher the boundary, the stronger the sense of community.
The easiest way to increase the sense of community is to raise the boundary to
being an accepted member of the community. This usually means developing a more
narrow focus for the community. We can use
Ramit Sethi's two-qualifier method here.
The best communities are those for {x} who do {y}. Where {x} and {y} are
demographic, habits, or psychographic variables (who we are, what we do/have
done/can do, and what we think/feel). See the table below:

You need to pick at least two.
If you have an existing community and want a stronger community, simply add
another boundary to the focus of the community.
This is why smaller communities typically have a stronger community (and more
active membership) than the larger behemoths. If we look at
the different types of community, we see a LARGE number of communities with
multiple qualifiers.

The
RockAndRoll tribe is a community for middle-aged (demographics) people who love
rock and roll (psychographics). Not for those that love rock and roll, not for
those middle-aged, but a very specific group that feel a strong sense of
community with one another.
Below,
BackPacking Light is for travellers (habits) who want to have the lightest
possible backpacks (psychographics). This crowd completely geek out on shaving a
few grams off their backpacks.

If you have an existing community, it's quite easy to increase the sense of
community by adding a common shared goal to the group and making this goal
explicit.
Most communities, especially those created by organizations, are aimless. Ask
10 members what they want to achieve in the future or what they fear and add
that as a boundary. E.g. "
This is a community for HR professionals who want to embrace collaborative
learning. "
If that's not possible, look at age, location, or experience factors. If say
only people with five years' experience in the field can join, everyone with 5+
years of experience will want to join. That's powerful.
The community for
StudentDoctors, for example, might not look like much but it hosts almost 15m
posts from 419,224 members. That makes it more popular than almost any community
for doctors. This group has common goals, experiences, and shared connections
with one another.

Our own community,
CommunityGeek, only accepts community professionals with a strong track record
in the social sciences. It's the two qualifiers that ensure we feel a strong
connection to one another.
We can also embrace a process known as
boundary maintenance in communities. This is a process by which boundaries are
made more visible and reinforced by references to it and, most importantly,
rituals and traditions.
In college groups, this used to be the reason behind hazing. Sadly, this isn't
something we can do in our communities. However, we have a ritual we make new
members go through. We usually ask them to share their biggest mistakes.
This is a powerful discussion for three reasons. It's usually funny and
interesting to new members, most people can identify with the mistakes, and it
makes people emotionally open to the group.
It's also a discussion that almost anyone can participate in. Guide people
towards these discussions as opposed to the generic and tedious
introduce yourself discussion. Make the introduction process fun and part of a
ritual your community uses.
Alternatively, use an experience-based discussion. For example,
BaristaExchange, below, asks members to share how they learned to roast. You
can adapt this to any community you're working on:
How/where did you learn to {x}?
When did you become interested in {y}?




2) Emotional safety
Communities should be a place where we can talk about things that we can't talk
about anywhere else. Sometimes that is a
ferocious 40,000 word debate about whether to capitalize the I in Star Trek:
iInto Darkness. Usually it's about discussing the geekiest or more hardcore
topics.
There aren't many places you can discuss current detection an a Allegro ACS756
on an ATmega328. Luckily, the terrific
Element14 community (by Premier Farnell) is one of them.

You should push your community to discussing the things they can't discuss
anywhere else. It might be being frustrated at how difficult it is to lose
weight with diabetes.

Communities should be a place where feel comfortable discussing the most
difficult, geekiest, or most hardcore topics in our space. Very often, this
means you need to initiate exactly these sorts of discussions.
Some communities, like
GAIA Online really want to discuss who would win in a fight between Kirk and
Spock. This gives them a feeling of emotional safety within the group. It leads
to strange sounding posts like these:

Make sure your community is the place to discuss the geekiest and most emotive
topics in your sector.
3)Personal investment
Members want to work to feel they have
earned their place in the group. The more they have invested their time,
resources, energy, emotions into the community they more they will continue to
participate to avoid cognitive dissonance.
The more we have invested into the success of the community, the more we feel a
connection to that group. The challenge is provide people easy, but meaningful,
methods of investing in the group at the beginning. We
want to work to fit in and be accepted.
There are a few simple tactics you can apply here. One is to turn your
community's registration form into an application form. This is a nifty act of
psychological ju-jitsu. The community becomes a place that you can join to a
place that you might be able to join if you're good enough. People that apply
are far more likely to participate. We use this in
CommunityGeek.

Another simple tactic shown above is priming members to be in the participation
mindset when they join.
We ask new members what they can offer the community when they join the group.
This forces them to think what skills and experiences they have and how they
could contribute them. Once they are approved (if they are accepted), they know
what they can do. They know what investments they can make in the community.
They also feel they have
earned their place in the community, as per above.
Don't send your newcomers aimlessly into the group. Guide them towards positive
actions they will convert them into regular members. Josh Elman's
talk at the HabitSummit is worth watching here (skip to 20 minutes in).
The most highly converting action we know of are self-disclosure discussions.
These are bonding-orientated self-discussions where we reveal information about
our experiences, our thoughts/opinions on different topics, or information about
who we are.
These discussions make people feel
a stronger sense of connection to the group, especially a virtual group.
The BaristaExchange example above is a good idea here. Some types of
discussions tend to work in all sectors. For example:How did you first become
interested in {topic}?
What was your biggest success in {topic}?
What was your worst mistake in {topic}?
Who do you most admire in {topic}?
Show off your best {topic-related thing}
Feel free to use your own. The goal is to guide a member to participate in this
discussion within the first few minutes of registering for the community.
You need to indoctrinate them into the social aspect of the community. Guide
members to participate in exactly these sorts of discussions via your
post-registration page, confirmation/welcome e-mail, autoresponders, and in any
personal messages to newcomers.
Update and rotate the discussion on a regular basis to keep it fresh.
Once someone participates they're more likely to visit again to see the
response to their contribution. They get caught up in the notification cycle of
visiting, contributing, being notified of a response, and visiting again.
Via this process they also become socialized into the community. They get to
know the other members.
The
community membership lifecycle is fickle; you need to offer members the
opportunity to make the right investments at the right time. These investments
gradually build up until a member becomes a regular participant in your
community and feels a strong sense of connection to the group.
4)Common symbol system
A big problem facing branded communities is the community feels like an
inauthentic marketing attempt to peddle whatever the organization is selling
this month.
You get companies initiating conversations like this:

I don't know "MB_Melissa".
She might genuinely be looking forward to hearing what you think.
She might be on the edge of her seat, refreshing the page constantly in
anticipation of the impending eruption of responses. But I doubt it.
I've never seen a member initiate a discussion using the phrase
"Product Discussion". Those very words conjure negative connotations. The body
of the content will make members cringe. The half-hearted and unnatural segue
into a discussion feels repulsive.
Inauthentic symbols undermine any possible sense of community. The only way to
overcome this is by bringing common symbol systems into the community.
You need to identify the words, images, ideas, and signs that have a unique
meaning to community members and spread them liberally throughout your
community.
This means mentioning them in content, naming the community after them (e.g.
Element14 is quite literally a symbol here), and naming parts of the community
after them. I don't know much about the
Coconut Monkeyhead Fun Club, but it's very popular in Carnival's terrific
community.

Talk to members of the target audience and pay special attention to the
expressions they use which have a unique meaning to them but not to outsiders.
Then use these symbols throughout the community.
This also means replicating their tone of voice and language style. That can be
difficult for many organizations to accept. This is why communities initiated by
amateurs are far more successful than those initiated by people paid to develop
them on behalf of organizations.
Action points:
Raise the boundary to being an accepted member of the community.Encourage more
personal investments of time, energy, emotions, and resources.Introduce a ritual
to the newcomer process.Introduce shared symbols to the community content (and
name)

People only participate in a community if they feel they can influence the
community. Notice the word
feel in that sentence. Not everyone will be able to influence the community,
but everyone needs to feel they could influence the community.
A big mistake of branded communities is they don't offer members enough
influence. We have efficacy needs to satisfy. To create this feeling we need to
do two things.
First, we need to create plenty of opportunities for members to have influence.
Second, we need to amplify the influence that members do have.
Creating opportunities for influence

Communities should provide members keen to be more involved with a simple
process of becoming more involved. If members want to write a regular column,
help run areas of the site, interview experts, organize events, approve and
welcome new members or lend their expertise, the community should have a place
where they can do that.
You can also interview the key members in the community that aren't putting
themselves forward but would benefit from the influence they then receive.

Feature contributions. Prominently feature the contributions of members on the
community platform. If a member makes a great contribution, mention it in a news
article and encourage the member to write a column based upon the topic.

Write about your members. Use your content to write what members are doing.
Talk about their milestones. It might be a work achievement, a topic-related
success or even a lifestyle success. If a member is getting married or has a
child, is climbing a mountain congratulate them. Profile members that are doing
interesting things.
Promote existing expertise. Find members who are already experts in a niche
topic within your field and invite them to have their own Ask Me areas in the
community.

This both encourages the existing members to participate more, shows other
members that they too could have their own
ask me area, and gives other members a reliable source of expertise on a
particular topic.
Or, if you have high-profile people in your sector,
Reddit's AMA (ask me anything) is an alternative approach that is usually
entertaining and helps bond the community into a group.

Just
be careful that the interviewee fully understands the concept.
Once people have had an influence, amplify and showcase the influence to the
rest of the community. Write case studies, add it to your
community's epic community history, and mention it in your news posts and your
newsletters. Shine as big a spotlight on the influence members have had as
possible.

The needs of the community and the individual need to align in a manner that's
beneficial to both. Too many communities focus on pumping out endless content.
This attracts a lot of people to read, but not to participate.
This doesn't satisfy our needs to be a part of a group with a strong identity.
We want to join groups that make us better than we are today. We want to
associate with the best, brightest, smartest, or otherwise most valued people in
our sector. We want to feel they have the same-shared values as we do.
Status of being a member
Being an accepted member should be a status symbol that members can embrace.
You need to raise the profile of the community outside of the platform. Make
sure it gets featured in relevant media. Set goals for the community to achieve,
and achieve them. The more you raise the profile of your community, the more
members want to join.

People do not join communities they don't feel will succeed. If your community
looks quiet/empty, you need to remove the dead areas of the site set small
milestones the community can achieve early on. Concentrate activity in as small
an area as possible so the community
feels active.
In CommunityGeek, we have no forum categories at all. All the activity takes
place on the landing page of the community. This makes the community feel very
active very early on.

If your community is highly active, then show off this high level of activity.
Highlight the quantity and quality of comments in the community. Make people
they are participating in something they has momentum and is successful.
The frontpage of
FetLife, a community for people with alternative sexual lifestyles (NSFW),
posts the numbers to all members on the landing page of community along with
testimonials about the site.

Competence
You need to attract and retain talented and knowledgeable members.
People want to be in a community with the best and brightest. You need to
attract them (appeal to their ego weekly columns, interviews etc) and keep them
engaged in the community. You need to ensure your community is the best fountain
of knowledge for your topic in your industry.
The best method of attracting key figures is to appeal to their ego. Interview
them, write about them in news posts, feature their work, create community
awards you can give them, or rank.
Alternatively, make the community exclusive and only for the best people in the
topic. All the best people in the topic will want to join (but pretend they
don't care about it).

Shared values

Members have to feel that fellow members share the same values. One method of
doing that is creating a constitution or purpose statement for the community
(mission statement has negative connotations). This outlines why the community
exists, what the community believes in, and what the community intends to
achieve.
You can send this out to all new members when they join the community to begin
indoctrinating them into the culture of the community.
Overcoming Bias, for example, posts the following statement:

This highlights to newcomers why this site exists and the purpose it serves its
members. Your community should do the same. It's usually best to base the
community around one of
BJ Fogg's motivations[xlv]. It should be based around pleasure, reducing pain,
hope for a change in the world, reducing fear of something bad happening, social
inclusion, or avoiding social exclusion.

The communities with the strongest sense of community oscillate at the same
emotional frequency. They are happy, sad, and angry at the same things at the
same time. Developing this shared emotional connection is difficult.
A shared emotional connection comprises of several elements. These include
regular contact, good quality of interactions, shared experiences, shared
history, and emotional openness.
Ensure regular contact
The more people interact, the more likely they will like each other. This is
based upon the
mere exposure effect. The more we are exposed to something, the more we like
it. In the contact hypothesis, the more frequently we come into contact with
other people, the more likely we are to like them.
Your members need to regularly interact with each other. Don't wait for these
interactions to happen,
proactively do things that drive these interactions.
Initiate regular weekly online discussions. Have live discussion topics around
different issues, interview VIPs in your sector live, organize online and
offline challenges or quizzes. Make sure your members are interacting with each
other as frequently as possible.
Make the interactions meaningful
The interactions have to be meaningful. Exchanging information is fine, but
limited. Introducing and highlighting (via sticky threads etc) bonding-related
or status-jockeying discussions will improve the quality to discussions.
Don't try to overly control what members want to talk about or force members to
talk about the topics you want to see more of. Let members lead the discussion
and see where it goes. At the British Medical Journal's
Doc2Doc community, we found most doctors didn't want to spend their spare time
sharing medical advice. In fact, they want to debate ethical dilemmas.
The most popular ever discussion was this one below;
was it wrong to use medical care to track down Osama Bin Laden?

This means you need to allow off-topic discussions. If members can only ever
talk about the topic, they will never get to know each other personally. If they
can't personally get to know more about each other (or even remember previous
contributions of members), they'll never feel a strong sense of community with
that group.
This is why it's common for the off-topic discussions to be the most popular
discussions in the majority of communities. People want to connect and get to
know more about each other. Don't shut these down.
Shared history
Ensure your community has an
epic and explicit history. Write it down. Talk about the major events and
activities that have taken place within the community. Make sure all newcomers
understand the narrative of the community their joining and their place within
it.
Nostalgia is good here too. Subtle reminders to positive events which have
taken place in the past reinforce the community identity.
Provoke emotional discussions
A final tactic is to introduce more emotionally provocative discussions.
Members are likely to feel the same way about the same things at the same time.
If you can provoke those discussions, members are likely to share their
feelings with one another about the topic.
If you begin introducing the above elements into your community, you should
begin to notice members feeling more familiar, the tone and the language
chances, and the overall sense of community begin to develop.
Measuring the sense of community

Measuring something as intangible as the sense of community is difficult. It
doesn't show up in Google Analytics. You have to survey a sample of members
using the
sense of community index (SCI-2) developed by David Chavis at
CommunityScience.com.

Don't invite all members to compete the survey. This will lead to a
non-response bias. Those most likely to feel a strong sense of community are
also those most likely to complete the survey. You need to segment your
community in four groups and obtain a sample from each group which broadly
represents the community.
We do this every quarter with some of our client communities. Here is an
example:


This is an example of an average sense of community result for a former client.
However this only paints a broad picture of what happened in the community. The
index allows us to identify which aspects of the sense of community are present
and which need further development.

Here you see that the sense of community was initially low within this client's
community. We decided to tackle one aspect at a time and improve that. In this
case, we chose influence. We decided to give members as many opportunities to
feel influential within the group.
This means we sub-divided the community into smaller groups, we increased the
number of interviews, we created opportunities for members to interview one
another, and we began mentioning the names of members in every single news post
we published in the community.
The level of influence rose immediately. Next we would tackle the shared
emotional connection with positive (although not quite as impressive) effects.
The power of this index is in identifying specifically what you can improve and
then using the tactics above to improve it.
Do you want a community that lasts for 30 years?

Last year, I had the opportunity to meet John Coates. Most people haven't heard
of John; he's the world's first ever online community manager. He was the
community manager of The WELL the first online community. The WELL was founded
in 1985.

When you listen to John speak, you realize that throughout the entire history
of the community they have always had an incredibly strong sense of community
among the group.
Developing a powerful sense of community is the most effective thing anyone
managing a community can do to increase the level of growth, activity, and value
over the community over the long-term.
Developing a sense of community will give you a community that lasts for years,
maybe decades, instead of month.
Developing a sense of community is something each one of us is able to do among
any group of people. Once you know and understand the elements above, it's easy
to use them to build any number of successful communities.
Good luck!
You can download half of my book,
Buzzing Communities, for free here:http://course.feverbee.com/learn-more

Click for a list of references used in this post





The Student Room Registration Form (2014) The Student Room Group Ltd
<Available from: http://www.thestudentroom.co.uk> [accessed April 9th,
2014]


McMillan, D. and Chavis, D (1984) Sense of Community: A Definition and
Theory, Journal of Community Psychology, Vol 14, No. 1. pp 6 23.


Ellemers, N., Kortekaas, P., and Ouwerkerk, W.W. (1999) Self-categorisation,
commitment to the group and group self-esteem as related but distinct aspects of
social identity, European Journal of Social Psychology, Vol 29, No. 2-3 pp. 371
389.


Koh, J., Kim YG, Kim, YG (2003) Sense of Virtual Community: A conceptual
framework and empirical validation, International Journal of Electronic
Commerce, Vol 8, No. 2. pp. 75 93.


Yoo, W-S, Suh, K-S, and Lee, M-B, (2002) Exploring the Factors Enhancing
Member Participation in Virtual Communities, Journal of Global Information
Management, Vol 10. No. 3. pp. 55 71.


Kim, W.G., Lee, C., Hiemstra, S.J. (2004) Effects of an online virtual
community on customer loyalty and travel product purchases, Tourism Management,
Vol 25. No. 3. pp. 343 355.


Woisetschlager, D.M., Hartleb, V., and Blut, M. (2008) How To Make Brand
Communities Work: Antecedents and Consequences of Consumer Participation,
Journal of Relationship Marketing, Vol 7. No. 3. pp. 237 256.


Rosenbaum, M.S., Ostrom, A.L., Kuntze, R. (2005) Loyalty programs and a
sense of community, Journal of Services Marketing, Vol 19. No. 4. pp. 222 233


Carlson, B. D., Suter, T.A., Brown, T.J. (2008) Social versus psychological
brand community: The role of psychological sense of brand community, Journal of
Business Research, Vol 61. No. 4. pp. 284 291.


Pajuniemi, J. (2009), The Revolution of Brand Marketing: The Era of Virtual
Consumer Communities, IN: Koskela, M. and Vinnari, M (2009) Future of the
Consumer Society, Proceedings of the Conference "Future of The Consumer Society"
28 29 May, 2009.


Poramate, K. Danbury, A.H., Parrot, G. (2012) Online behaviour of luxury
brand advocates: differences between active advocates and passive loyalists, The
11th International Conference on Research in Advertising (ICORIA) June 28-30,
Stockholm.


Lyu, J.W (2012) The Role of Sense of Community in Online Brand Social
Networking Sites, PhD diss., University of Tennessee, 2012.


A. Hars, S.S. Ou (2002) Working for free? Motivations for participating in
open-source projects, International Journal of Electronic Commerce, Vol 6. No.
3. pp. 25 39.


W.S. Yoo, K.S. Suh, M.B. Lee (2002) Exploring factors enhancing member
participation in virtual communities, Journal of Global Information Management,
Vol 10. No. 3. pp. 5571.


Sharratt, M. and Usoro, A. (2003), Understanding Knowing-Sharing in Online
Communities of Practice, Electronic Journal on Knowledge Management, Vol 1. No.
2. pp. 187 196.


Hiltz, S.R., Wellman, B. (1997) Asynchronous Learning Networks as A Virtual
Classroom, Communication of the ACM, Vol 40. No. 9 pp. 44 49.


Ramit Sethi (2011) The Two Qualifier Method, Mint.com <available from:
https://www.mint.com/blog/how-to/make-more-money-sethi-02032011/?doing_wp_cron=1396951372.4350121021270751953125>
[accessed April 8, 2014]


FeverBee (2014) Types of Community, FeverBee <available from:
http://course.feverbee.com/TypesofCommunities.pdf> [Accessed: April 9th,
2014]


RockAndRoll Tribe (2014) RockAndRoll Tribe Homepage <available from:
http://www.rockandrolltribe.com> [Accessed: April 8th, 2014]


BackPackingLight (2014) BackPackingLight Homepage <available from:
http://www.backpackinglight.com> [Accessed: April 8th, 2014]


StudentDoctor (2014) StudentDoctor.net Homepage <available from:
http//www.studentdoctor.net > [Accessed: April 9th, 2014]


CommunityGeek (2014) CommunityGeek homepage <Available from:
http://www.communitygeek.com> [Accessed: April 9th, 2014]


BaristaExchange (2014) BaristaExchange Homepage <Available from:
http://www.baristaexchange.com> [Accessed: April 9th, 2014]


Morris, K. (2013) Wikipedians wage war over capital "I" in new "Star Trek"
Film, The Daily Dot <Available from:
http://www.dailydot.com/society/wikipedia-star-trek-into-darkness-capitalization/>
[Accessed: April 9, 2014]


Element14 (2014) Premier Farnell, Element 14 Homepage <Available from:
http://www.element14.com> [Accessed April 9, 2014]


Element14 (2014) Current Detection with a Allergro ACS2756 on an ATmega328
<available from:
http://www.element14.com/community/thread/17281/l/current-detection-with-a-allegro-acs756-on-an-atmega328>
[Accessed April 8, 2014]


3fatchicks (2014) Is anyone else frustrated about not losing weight with
diabetes <available from:
http://www.3fatchicks.com/forum/diabetes-support/290150-anyone-else-frustrated-about-not-losing-weight-diabetes.html>
[Accessed April 9, 2014]


GAIA Online (2014) Captain Kirk Vs. Spock: Who Would Win <Available from:
http://www.gaiaonline.com/forum/entertainment-discussion/captain-kirk-vs-spock-who-would-win/t.52739703_16/>
[Accessed April 9, 2014]


Aronson, E., &Mills, J. (1959). The effect of severity of initiation on
liking for a group. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, Vol. 59, pp.
177-181.


Josh Elman (2014) How Twitter Build User Habits, Habit Summit 2014
<available from: http://2014.habitsummit.com/video/87544293> [Accessed
April 9, 2014]


Joinson AN (2001) Self-disclosure in computer-mediated communication: the
role of self-awareness and visual anonymity, European Journal of Social
Psychology, Vol 31, No. 2. pp. 177 - 192


FeverBee (2014) The Community Membership Lifecycle <available from:
http://course.feverbee.com/CommunityMembershipLifecycle.pdf> [Accessed April
9, 2014]


GenerationBenz (2014) Cadillac Product Discussion (Hosted by Melissa),
Generation Benz <available from: http://generationbenz.com/> [Accessed
April 8, 2014]


Coconut Monkeyhead Fun Club (2014) Coconut Monkeyhead Fun Club, Carnival
<available from: http://www.carnival.com/Funville/forums/t/188592.aspx>
[Accessed April 8, 2014]


Carnival Funville (2014) Carnival Funville Homepage <Available from:
http://www.carnival.com/funville/forums/> [Accessed April 9, 2014]


Mixergy (2014) Interview: saluting our top community member <available
from:
http://blog.mixcloud.com/2010/01/26/interview-saluting-our-top-community-member/>
[Accesssed April 9, 2014]


Mashable (2012) Top 6 Comments on Mashable This Week <available from:
http://mashable.com/2012/01/07/top-6-comments/> [Accessed April 9, 2014]


Element14 (2009) Have a question about ADCs or DACs> Ask our Expert, Nick
Gray <available from:
http://www.element14.com/community/thread/2449/l/have-a-question-about-adcs-or-dacs-ask-our-expert-nick-gray>
[Accessed April 9, 2014]


Reddit (2011) IAM Christopher Pool, aka "moot," founder of 4chan & Canvas.
AMA! <available from:
http://www.reddit.com/r/IAmA/comments/gdzfi/iam_christopher_poole_aka_moot_founder_of_4chan/>
[Accessed April 9, 2014]


Crugnale, J (2012) Woody Harrelson AMA (Ask me Anything Goes Disatrously
Wrong On Reddit, Mediaite <available from:
http://www.mediaite.com/online/woody-harrelson-ama-ask-me-anything-goes-disastrously-wrong-on-reddit>
[Accessed April 9, 2014]





FeverBee (2009) Write an Epic History <Available from:
http://www.feverbee.com/2009/11/epichistory.html> [Accessed April 8, 2014]


Greenslade, R. (2014) Mumsnet Backs No More Page 3 Campaign, Guardian Online
<available from:
http://www.theguardian.com/media/greenslade/2014/jan/24/mumsnet-page-3>
[Accessed: April 9, 2014]


FetLife (2014) FetLife Homepage <Available from:
http://www.fetlife.com> [Accessed: April 9, 2014]


Overcoming Bias (2014) Overcoming Bias About Page <available from:
http://www.overcomingbias.com/about> [Accessed April 9, 2014]


Fogg, BJ (2009) A behavior model for persuasive design, IN: Proceedings
Persuasive '09 Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Persuasive
Technology.


Zajonc, R.B. (1968). Attitudinal Effects Of Mere Exposure, Journal of
Personality and Social Psychology, Vol 9, No. 2. pp. 1 - 27


FeverBee (2010) The Basics of Increasing Interactions In Any Online
Community <Available from:
http://www.feverbee.com/2010/10/interactions.html> [Accessed April 9, 2014]


Doc2Doc (2014) Doc2Doc Homepage, British Medical Journal <available from:
http://doc2doc.bmj.com/> [Accessed April 9, 2014]


Matthew Billingsley (2010) Was it wrong to use medical care as a reason to
track down Bin Laden?, Doc2Doc, British Medical Journal <available from:
http://doc2doc.bmj.com/forums/off-duty_news-media_wrong-use-medical-care-reason-trap-bin-laden_.0>
[Accessed April 8, 2014]


CommunityScience (2014) Sense of Community Index 2 (SCI-2): Background,
Instrument, and Scoring Instructions <available from:
http://www.communityscience.com/pdfs/Sense%20of%20Community%20Index-2(SCI-2).pdf>
[Accessed April 9, 2014]


CommunityScience (2014) Community Science Homepage <available from:
http://www.communityscience.com> [Accessed April 9, 2014]


Wikipedia (2014) Non-response bias <Available from:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Non-response_bias> [Accessed April 9, 2014]


The Well (2014) The Well homepage <Available from:
http://www.well.com> [Accessed April 9, 2014]




Interested in learning more about the science behind community building? Rich
Millington will be speaking on How to Use Social Science to Build Addictive
Communities at this year's MozCon, July 14-16 in Seattle. Register today!

Sign up for The Moz Top 10, a semimonthly mailer updating you on the top ten
hottest pieces of SEO news, tips, and rad links uncovered by the Moz team. Think
of it as your exclusive digest of stuff you don't have time to hunt down but
want to read!

You may view the latest post at
http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/seomoz/~3/_ENByAmwaRM/sense-of-community

You received this e-mail because you asked to be notified when new updates are
posted.
Best regards,
Build Backlinks Online
peter.clarke@designed-for-success.com